A Comparative Study of Clinical and Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation at Term with the Actual Birth Weight

Main Article Content

Srushti Ramesh
Vidhyalakshmi R. K.
Saswati Tripathy
Dhruva Nandi

Abstract

Introduction


Determination of fetal weight is of utmost importance in obstetrics as it helps in monitoring intrauterine growth, detecting high risk pregnancy, labour management and delivery of the baby.


Objective


The aim of our study is to compare the accuracy in estimating fetal weight with ultrasound-based Hadlock's formula, clinically based methods- Insler’s, Johnson's formula and actual birth weight.


Methodology


This prospective comparative study was done in a tertiary care centre between December 2021 and March 2022. 60 consecutive antenatal women were recruited in this study after giving informed consent. Hadlock's formula was used to calculate the estimated fetal weight by ultrasonography and the clinical weight estimation was done by using Johnson’s and Insler’s formula and was compared with actual birth weight.


Results


The mean actual birth weight is 3026.93 ± 372.40 grams, the average birth weight determined by Johnson's formula is 3391.92 ± 306.16 grams and the average birth weight determined by Insler’s formula is 3344.13 ± 589.50 grams. The Hadlock’s Formula as compared to Johnson’s and Insler’s formula, has proven to be a very accurate predictor of the baby's actual birth weight with a sensitivity of 96.55%(96.55%> 79.31%> 65.52%).


Conclusion


Ultrasonography estimation is recommended over clinical estimation method as it yields more accurate fetal weight than other clinical modalities. Also, Johnson’s formula has been reported to be more sensitive than Insler’s formula. Thus, in developing countries where the access to the ultrasound is challenging, estimation of fetal weight close to term can be done by clinical method employing Johnson’s formula.

Article Details

How to Cite
Srushti Ramesh, Vidhyalakshmi R. K., Saswati Tripathy, & Dhruva Nandi. (2022). A Comparative Study of Clinical and Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation at Term with the Actual Birth Weight. Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, 10(3), 711–721. Retrieved from https://www.jclmm.com/index.php/journal/article/view/252
Section
Articles

References

Ugwu EO, Udealor PC, Ozumba BC, Okeke DO, Dim CC, Obi SN, et al. Accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in predicting actual birth weight in enugu, southeastern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2014;17(3):270.

Njoku C, Emechebe C, Odusolu P, Abeshi S, Chukwu C, Ekabua J. Determination of accuracy of fetal weight using ultrasound and clinical fetal weight estimations in Calabar South, South Nigeria. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2014;2014:1–6.

Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass MA. Macrosomic births in the United States: Determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;188(5):1372–8.

Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Ohlsson A, Golan A. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;182(1):198–206.

Bajracharya J, Shrestha NS, Karki C. Accuracy of prediction of birth weight by fetal ultrasound. Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2013;10(2):74–6.

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. the value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. 1984;150(2):535–40.

Shittu AS, Kuti O, Orji EO, Makinde NO, Ogunniy SO, Ayoola OO, Sule SS. Clinical versus sonographic estimation of Fetal weight in southwest Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(1):14-23.

Wilcox AJ, Skjaerven R. Birth weight and perinatal mortality: the effect of gestational age. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(3):378-82.

Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, Regan L, Robinson S. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;10. 111(1):9-14.

Horton A, Diaz J, Mastrogiannis D. Accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasonography compared with the Leopold maneuver and effect of maternal obesity. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:193.

Kayem G, Grangé G, Bréart G. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:566–571.

Preyer O, Husslein H, Concin N, Ridder A, Musielak M, Pfeifer C, Oberaigner W, Husslein P. Fetal weight estimation at term - ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold's manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;11;19(1):122.

Watson WJ, Soisson AP, Harlass FE. Estimated weight of the term fetus. Accuracy of ultrasound vs. clinical examination. J Reprod Med. 1988 ;33(4):369-71

Fleming A, Riva JD, McAdoo G. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound in term pregnancy. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 1996;12(1):7–10.

Sereke SG, Omara RO, Bongomin F, Nakubulwa S, Kisembo HN. Prospective verification of sonographic fetal weight estimators among term parturients in Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):175.

Nicolaides KH, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Wright A, Akolekar R. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:44–51.

Malin, GL, Bugg, GJ, Takwoingi, Y, Thornton, JG, Jones, NW. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2016; 123: 77– 88.

Orji EO. Analysis of obstructed labour at Ife State Hospital. Sahel Med J. 2002;5:143–8