“Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Application of Monolithic and Folding Implants in Rehabilitation of Elderly Patients with Various Degrees of Atrophy of Alveolar Processes

Main Article Content

Vaibhav Bhadane
Jyoti Tembhurne
Arti Gangurde
Manish Chauhan
Niraja Jaiswal
Ravikumar Akulwar

Abstract

Aim: The long-term success rates of single-stage and two-stage surgeries including dental implantation with monolithic and collapsible implants for the rehabilitative treatment of elderly patients were compared and contrasted. Materials and methods: Sixty individuals, ages 60 to 70, with a wide range of dentition defect diagnoses, were observed in clinical settings. The research used mechanical oscillatory - resonance, statistical analysis, implant placement using the ART IMPLANT system's non-removable implants, placement of a fixed interim prosthesis, and immediate occlusal functional load are all part of the single-stage surgical procedure. Results: Using a single-stage protocol of dental implant surgery and non-detachable implants considerably reduced the time required for surgical phases of treatment and full rehabilitation (p 0.05). Conclusions: Therefore, it is important to highlight the system's therapeutic application, To rehabilitate the jaws of elderly patients with variable degrees of alveolar process atrophy, a single-stage surgical approach including the use of non-detachable (monolithic) dental implants has been developed.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bhadane, V. ., Tembhurne, J. ., Gangurde, A. ., Chauhan, M. ., Jaiswal, N. ., & Akulwar, R. . (2023). “Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Application of Monolithic and Folding Implants in Rehabilitation of Elderly Patients with Various Degrees of Atrophy of Alveolar Processes . Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, 11(1), 675–679. Retrieved from https://www.jclmm.com/index.php/journal/article/view/399
Section
Articles

References

“Kandelman D., Petersen P.E., Arpin S., Ogawa H. Global oral health of older people – call for public health action. Community Dental Health. 2010; 27 (2): 257-268. 2.

Compton Sh.M., Clark D., Chan S. et al. Dental Implants in the Elderly Population: A Long-Term Follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):164-170.

Manfredini, D., Poggio, C.E. & Lobbezoo, F. (2014) Is Bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 16: 460–469.

Cardaropoli, G., Lekholm, U. & Wennstrom, J.L. (2006) Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 17: 165–171.

Gheisari R., Eatemadi H., Alavian A. Comparison of the Marginal Bone Loss in One-stage versus Two-stage Implant Surgery. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017; 18(4): 272–276.

Schrott A., Riggi-Heiniger M., Maruo K., Gallucci G.O. Implant loading protocols for partially edentulous patients with extended edentulous sites--a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 239-255.

Thoma D.S. et al. Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation performed simultaneously with dental implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(21):257.

Herrero-Climent M., Ruiz R.M.M., Diaz-Castro C.M. et al. Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2014;29: 1374–1379.

Yaremenko O.I., Kotenko M.V., Rozdors'kyy V.V., Snizhko V.V. Porivnyal'nyy analiz efektyvnosti metodiv nehaynoyi implantatsiyi (Chastyna II). Instytut stomatolohiyi. 2013;4(58):36-37.