Using a Three-Dimensional Superimposition Technique, Studying the Effects of Different Cooling Procedures on the Adaptability of Rapidly Heat-Cured Acrylic Denture Bases
Main Article Content
Aim: The purpose of this study is to use a 3D superimposition technique to examine how different cooling techniques affect denture base adaptation of rapidly heated acrylic resin.
Setting and Design: Comparative in vitro study.
Materials and Method: Five different cooling techniques were used to adapt two different polymethyl methacrylate acrylic resins for denture bases. For the purpose of creating denture bases with a standardized thickness, Casts in stone of 50 edentulous maxillae were made. Based on the components used and the methods of cooling, the samples were divided into five groups (n = 10). A 3Shape E1 laboratory scanner was used to examine the professional stone cast and all forty replacement dental implant bases. Each dental replacement base was examined, and then, using the Appear 3-Matic application, the filtered picture was superimposed on top of the expert cast filter. Color surface maps were made to display the three-dimensional contrasts between the two surfaces for a visual qualitative assessment.
The statistical analysis included the use of the generalised Linear Model Test as well as the Bonferroni Post Hoc Analysis.
Results: There was a large area of green across the whole palatal surface in all of the instances that were cooled in the seats, but the red variation regions enlarged in the swiftly cooled examples, particularly in the taste buds and the post-dam areas. The Summed Direct Model test and Bonferroni post hoc analysis both confirmed that there was significant variation in root means square quality across the various sample sets.
Conclusion: By and large, the accuracy of the samples that were cooled on the bench was higher than that of the quick cooling groups. In spite of the need for faster denture manufacturing, bench cooling of quickly heat-cured PMMA is important for satisfactory denture base adaption.
Chander NG. Polymethyl metha acrylate denture base: An overview. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18:87.
Ali AA, John J, Mani SA, El‐Seedi HR. Effect of thermal cycling on flexural properties of microcrystalline cellulose-reinforced denture base acrylic resins. J Prosthodont 2019;29:611 6.
Firtell DN, Green AJ, Elahi JM. Posterior peripheral seal distortion related to processing temperature. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:598 601.
de Negreiros WA, Consani RL, Verde MA, da Silva AM, Pinto LP. The role of polymerization cycle and post pressing time on tooth movement in complete dentures. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:467 72.
Polychronakis N, Yannikakis S, Zissis A. A clinical 5 year longitudinal study on the dimensional changes of complete maxillary dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:78 81.
Kimoto S, Kobayashi N, Kobayashi K, Kawara M. Effect of bench cooling on the dimensional accuracy of heat cured acrylic denture base material. J Dent 2005;33:57 63.
Consani RL, Domitti SS, Mesquita MF, Consani S. Influence of flask closure and flask cooling methods on tooth movement in maxillary dentures. J Prosthodont 2006;15:229 34.
Keenan PL, Radford DR, Clark RK. Dimensional change in complete dentures fabricated by injection molding and microwave processing. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:37 44.
Habib SR, Al Otaibi AK, Al Anazi TA, Al Anazi SM. Comparison between five CAD/CAM systems for fit of zirconia copings. Quintessence Int 2018;49:437 444.
McLaughlin JB, Ramos V Jr., Dickinson DP. Comparison of fit of dentures fabricated by traditional techniques versus CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthodont 2019;28:428 35.
Brosky ME, Pesun IJ, Lowder PD, DeLong R, Hodges JS. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:204 9.
Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:249 56. 13. McGarry TJ, Nimmo A, Skiba JF, Ahlstrom RH, Smith CR, Koumjian JH. Classification system for complete edentulism. J Prosthodont 1999;8:27 39.
Norvell NG, Korioth TV, Cagna DR, Versluis A. Comparison of digital surface displacements of maxillary dentures based on noninvasive anatomic landmarks. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:123 31.
Skinner EW, Jones PM. Dimensional stability of self curing denture base acrylic resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1955;51:426 31.
Ceruti P, Mobilio N, Bellia E, Borracchini A, Catapano S, Gassino G. Simplified edentulous treatment: A multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the timing and clinical outcomes of the technique. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:462 7.
John J, Ann Mani S, Palaniswamy K, Ramanathan A, Razak AA. Flexural properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) resin reinforced with oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers: A preliminary finding. J Prosthodont 2015;24:233 8.
Allen PF, McMillan AS. Alongitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:173 9.
Jadhav SS, Mahajan N, Sethuraman R. Comparative evaluation of the amount of the residual monomer in conventional and deep-frozen heat cure polymethylmethacrylate acrylic resin: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18:147-53.
Sakaguchi RL, Ferrancane J, Powers JM. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 14th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2012.
Lee CJ, Bok SB, Bae JY, Lee HH. Comparative adaptation accuracy of acrylic denture bases evaluated by two different methods. Dent Mater J 2010;29:411 7.
Basso MF, Giampaolo ET, Machado AL, Pavarina AC, Vergani CE. Evaluation of the occlusion vertical dimension of complete dentures after microwave disinfection. Gerodontology 2012;29:e815 21.
Campos MS, Cavalcanti BN, Cunha VP. Occlusal changes in complete dentures processed by pack and press and injection pressing techniques. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:78 80. 24. Hsu CY, Yang TC, Wang TM, Lin LD. Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:740 7.
Cole D, Bencharit S, Carrico CK, Arias A, Tüfekçi E. Evaluation of fit for 3D printed retainers compared with thermoform retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:592 9.
Hwang HJ, Lee SJ, Park EJ, Yoon HI. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:110 7.
Manjin Z, Mariko H, Yuka S, Kelimu ME, Rongguang L, Yuan G, et al. OSC10: Observation of the teeth position in cleft lip and palate patients using three-dimensional assessment. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018;18 (Suppl 1):S11.
Dastane A, Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J, Mehra R, Hesby R. Development and evaluation of a new 3‐D digitization and computer graphic system to study the anatomic tissue and restoration surfaces. J Oral Rehab 1996;23:25 34.
Artopoulos A, Juszczyk AS, Rodriguez JM, Clark RK, Radford DR. Three dimensional processing deformation of three denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:481 7.
Fenlon MR, Juszczyk AS, Rodriguez JM, Curtis RV. Dimensional stability of complete denture permanent acrylic resin denture bases; a comparison of dimensions before and after a second curing cycle. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2010;18:33 8.
Laot CM, Marand E, Schmittmann B, Zia R. Effects of cooling rate and physical aging on the gas transport properties in polycarbonate. Macromolecules 2003;36:8673 84.
Ohyama A, Imai Y. Differential scanning calorimetric study of acrylic resin powders used in dentistry. Dent Mater J 2000;19:346 51.
Komiyama O, Kawara M. Stress relaxation of heat activated acrylic denture base resin in the mold after processing. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:175 81.
Savirmath A, Mishra V. A comparative evaluation of the linear dimensional changes of two different commercially available heat cure acrylic resins during three different cooling regimens. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2016;10:ZC50 4.
Kobayashi N, Komiyama O, Kimoto S, Kawara M. Reduction of shrinkage on heat‐activated acrylic denture base resin obtaining gradual cooling after processing. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:710 6.
Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Lümkemann N, Stawarczyk B. Accuracy of digitally fabricated trial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:942 7.
Jang Y, Sim JY, Park JK, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Accuracy of 3 unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D printed casts. J Prosthet Dent 2019;123:135 42.
Mubarak S, Hmud A, Chandrasekharan S, Ali AA. Prevalence of denture related oral lesions among patients attending College of Dentistry, University of Dammam: A clinico pathological study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5:506 12.