Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Primary Bone Tumors

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 11, 2023
Keywords:
radiographic radiologist bone tumor lesion diagnostic destruction skeletal neoplastic metastatic

Main Article Content

Pramod Shaha
Professor and Head Department of Radio diagnosis Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth “Deemed To Be University”, Karad – 415110, Maharashtra
Asif I. Tamboli
Associate Professor Department of Radio diagnosis Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth “Deemed To Be University”, Karad – 415110, Maharashtra
Tejaswini H.
P.G. Student Department of Radio diagnosis Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth “Deemed To Be University”, Karad – 415110, Maharashtra

Abstract

The radiographic features of a bone tumor or tumor-like lesion help in the diagnosis or narrow this same diagnostic possibilities based on the patient's history, the pattern of bone destruction, the margins of the lesion, its location, site, and placement within the skeletal structure as well as within the individual bone, and whether or not it is a single lesion or a collection of lesions. When combined with clinical data, these radiographic characteristics assist determine whether a lesion is primary or metastatic, neoplastic or benign.

Article Details

How to Cite
Shaha, P. ., Tamboli, A. I. ., & H., T. . (2023). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Primary Bone Tumors. Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, 11(1), 1466–1472. Retrieved from https://www.jclmm.com/index.php/journal/article/view/543
Issue
Vol. 11: Number 1, 2023
Section
Articles

References

JL.Bloem,R.Bluemm,A.H.M.Taminiau,A.TvanOosterom,J.Stolk, J.Doornbos. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Primary malignant bone tumours. The Radiological Society of North America. May 1987;7(3):425-445.

S Baweja ,R Arora ,S Singh, A Sharma, P Narang. Evaluation of Bone Tumours with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Co-relation with surgical and Pathological Findings. IJRI 2006 ;16(4):611-618.

Weatherall PT. Benign and malignant masses. MR imaging differentiation. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clin N Am. 1995 Nov; 3(4):669-94.

Maximilian F. Reiser. MRI in diagnosis and staging of bone tumours. AJR 1996;132:567-576.

Wolfgang Schima, Gabriele Amann. Preoperative Staging of Osteosarcoma: Efficacy of MR imaging in detecting joint involvement. AJR 1994 ;163 .1171-1175.

BalzariniL,SiciliaA,CegliaE,TesoroTessJD,TrecateG,Musumeci

R. Magnetic resonancein primarybonetumors: areviewof 10years of activities. Radiol Med. 1996 Apr; 91(4):344-7.

Priolo F Cerase A.The current role of radiographyin the assessment of skeletal tumors and tumor-like lesions. . Eur J Radiol. 1998 May; 27 (1):S77-85.

Anil Dhal. Mercer‟sorthopaedic surgery. Chapter 1 Introduction first Indian editions, RB Duthie, G Bentley, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, India; 203;1-42.

HD.Dorfman,D.Vanel,B. Czemiak,YK.Park,R.Kotz,KKUnni.WHO classification of bone tumours. Cancer 1995 Jan 1; 75(Suppl. 1):203- 10.

Enneking WF, Sapnier SS, Goodman MA. Current concepts Review, the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surgery [Am] 1980.

Sundaram M, McGuire MH, Herbold DR5 Wolverson MK, Heiberg E. Magnetic resonance imaging in planning limb-salvage surgery for primary malignant tumors of bone. Journal for bone & joint surgeryl986 Jul; 68(6):809-

Levy WM, Miller AS, Bonakdarpour A, Aegerter E. Aneurysmal bone cyst secondary to other osseous lesions : Report of 57 cases. Am J Clin Patho Jan l997;63(l):l-8.

Zimmer WD, Berquist TH, McLeod RA, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Shives TC, Wold LE, May GR. Magnetic resonance imaging ofosteosarcomas. Comparison with computed tomography. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 1986 Jul; (208):289-99.

Boyko OB, CoryDA, Cohen MD, Provisor A, Mirkin D, DeRosa GP.MR imaging of osteogenic and Ewing's sarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Feb; 148(2):317-22.

HollandBR, Freyschmidt J. Magnetic resonancetomographic results in bone changes associated with sclerosis. Rofo. 1988 Nov; 149(5):513- 21.

Masciocc.hi C, Fascetti E, Gallucci M, Beomonte Zobel B, Manili M, Ghera S Santori FS Passariello R. Osteosarcoma. A new diagnostic approach in presurgical loco-regional staging. Rad.ol Med. 1988 Oct;76(4):249-54.

Reuther G, Mutschler W. Thevalue of CT and MRT in the diagnosis of cartilage forming tumors. Rofo 1989 Dec;151(6):647-52.

Beltran J, Chandnani V, McGhee RA Jr, Kursunoglu-Brahme S. Gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced MR imaging of the musculoskeletalsystem. AJR AmJ Roentgenol1991 Mar; 15693):457- 66.

Aoki J, Sone S, Fujioka F, Terayama K, Ishii K, Karakida O, Imai S, Sakai F Imal Y. MR of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma: rings and arcs of Gd-DTPA enhancement. J Comput Assist Tomogr.1991 Nov- Dec; 15(6): 1011-6.

Davies AM, Wellings RM. Imaging of bone tumors. CurrOpinRadiol. 1992; 4(6):32-8.

Geirnaerdt MJ, Bloem JL, Eulderink F, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH. Cartilaginous tumors: correlation of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and histopathological findings. Radiology. 1993 Mar; 186(3):813-7.

Burr BA, Resnick D, Syklawer R, Haghighi P. Fluid-fluid levels in a unicameral bone cyst: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993 Jan-Feb;17(l):134-6.

CohenIJ, Hadar H, Schreiber R, Horev G, KatzK, Meller I, Yosipovitch Z, Zaizov R. Primary bone tumor resectability: the value of serial MRI studies in the determination of the feasibility, timing, and extent oftumor resection. J PediatrOrthop. 1994 Nov-Dec; 14(6):781-7.

Maheshwari AV, Shinault SS, Robinson PG, Pitcher JD Jr. Cystic presentation of Ewing‟s sarcoma with indolent clinic-radiologic behaviour. Acta OrthopBelg 2009 Dec;75(6):836-41.

Rubin BP, Antonescu CR, Gannon FH, Hunt JL, Inwards CY, Klein MJ et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with tumors of bone. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Apr; 134(4):el-7.

Obalum DC, Eyesan SU, Ogo CN, Enweluzo GO. Multicentre study of bone tumours. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2010 Mar; 17(l):23-6.