Assessment of Geriatric Depression among Elderly Peoples Residing at Rural Area of Kheda District, Gujarat.
Main Article Content
Background Depression is a major mental health problem, which is yet to be recognized as an important public health challenge. About 322 million people affected with depression worldwide.
Depression among the elderly population in India has been recognized as one of the major public health problems with a prevalence of 8 to 22%. It causes significant suffering and accounts for 5.7% of the years lived with disability, to make matters worse, it has been reported that in many cultures and societies, deteriorating mental status, say it dementia or depression, has been perceived as a part of normal ageing.
Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the magnitude and risk factors of depression in elderly people residing in rural area of Gujarat. Objective: 1. To assess the level of depression among elderly people residing at rural area. 2. To find out Significant Association between the level of depression selected demographic variables among elderly people at rural area.
Design and Setting: A cross sectional descriptive study design was used. Non probability convenient sampling technique was used to drawn samples. 100 elderly persons were screened. Geriatric depression scale (GDS) was used to assess depressive level. A self-rating questionnaire tool was used to collect data and some socio-demographics and clinical variables. Prior to data collection written setting permission obtain from authority of the village and written consent from was obtained from the participants. Data for study was collected by door to door visit in selected community. Chi square was employed to determine association of collected data. Tool consists of following Section A: Socio-demographic variables. Section B: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
The GDS questions are answered ‘yes’ or ‘no’, instead of a five-category response set. This simplicity enables the scale to be used with ill or moderately cognitively impaired individuals. The scale is commonly used as a routine part of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. One point is assigned to each answer and the cumulative score is rated on a scoring grid. The grid sets a range of 0–9 as ‘normal’, 10–19 as ‘mildly depressed’, and 20–30 as ‘severely depressed.
Results: Results showed that 61% was Male and 39% was Female. The majority of had 71% primary education. Regarding work majority 60% are labor, regarding financial dependency most 62% was independent, 35(35%) dependent. This study reveals that level of depression among geriatric peoples, 51 (51%) peoples had no depression, 33 (33%) having mild depression and 16 (16%) having severe depression level.
Conclusion: It is concluded that nearly 50% of geriatric peoples having no depression and mild depression is more prevalent among elderly in selected rural area of Gujarat. So majority of the elderly peoples were found normal.
P. Prakash ‘textbook of mental health and psychiatric nursing’, first edition 2020,CBS publisher and distributors, Ansari road daryaganj new Delhi- page no 210-208.
R. Shravani, “A guide to mental health and psychiatric nursing ”, 4th edition 2016,jaypee brothers medical publisher, Kathmandu Nepal, page no – 208, 212-213.
Alexopoulos, George S. “Depression in the elderly.” Lancet (London, England) vol. 365,9475 (2005): 1961-70. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66665-2.
Goyal, A., & Kajal, K. S. (2014). Prevalence Of Depression In Elderly Population In The Southern Part Of Punjab. Journal Of Family Medicine And Primary Care, 3(4), 359–361. Https://Doi.Org/10.4103/2249-4863.148109
Barua, Ankur, et al. "Socio-demographic Factors of Geriatric Depression". Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, vol. 32, no. 2, July 2010, pp. 87-92. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.78503.
UNDESA (United Nation for Department of Economic and Social Affair). World Population Prospect 2019. UNDESA; 2019
Kumar, Abhishek et al. “Screening of Depression in Elderly Population Using a Geriatric Depression Scale in the Field Practice Area of Urban Health Training Centre Attached to SMS Medical College, Jaipur.” Cureus vol. 13,6 e15859. 23 Jun. 2021, doi:10.7759/cureus.15859
Blazer DG. Depression in late life: Review and commentary. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2003;58:249–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Published in final edited form as: Vis cogn. 2014; 22(8): 1014–1017. doi:10.1080/13506285.2014.960
B.T Basvanthappa ‘psychiatric mental health nursing’, first edition2007 , jaypee brothers , medical publisher new Delhi, page no-500-510.
Gail w.stuart, ‘principal and practice of psychiatric nursing’, 9th edition Elsevier karnal road new Delhi, page no – 305.
Christian A, Nagar K. Understanding Patients Experiences Living with Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Study, Gujarat, India. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;33(58A):464-471. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i58A34139 . Epub 2021 Dec 15. PMID: 35024509
Suthar DB, Nagar K. A Study To Assess The Effectiveness Of Planned Teaching Programme On Prevention Of Selected Life Style Diseases In Terms Of Knowledge And Attitude Among Male Adults At Selected PHC Of Kheda District. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021 May 17;15(3):15732. doi: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.15732. PMID: 34434007.
Jinal Patel, Rahul Parmar, Heena Solanki, Bhumi Pando, Fiza Vohra, Prachi Patel, Kailash Nagar, & Virendra Jain. (2022). Occupational Health Problems Among Tobacco Processing Factory Workers, at Kheda District Gujarat: A Cross Sectional Study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 1378–1387. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S09.165.
Prachi Patel, & Kailash Nagar. (2022). Effectiveness of Educational Package Regarding Knowledge, Attitude and Utilization of Selected Contraceptive Methods among Postnatal Mother at Selected PHC of Kheda District Gujarat. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S04.121.
Ms. Shweta Prajapati, & Mr. Kailash Nagar. (2022). Safety Education on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Towards Road Traffic Signs and Regulations Among College Students At, Gujarat. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 948–958. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S04.112